- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:02:44 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 11/04/2011 09:38 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:54 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> The radial-gradient() spec defines 'cover' as an alias for 'farthest-corner' >> and 'contain' as an alias for 'closest-side'. >> >> We generally try to avoid aliases in CSS, why do we have these here and >> can we remove one of the pairs? > > Blame my youthful naivete. I originally created the closest/farthest > keywords, and then thought that reusing bg-size's cover/contain > keywords would be more intuitive, so I had them both. > > I know I've seen usage of both forms in the wild. Hm. So I'd suggest dropping cover/contain, and adding them back when we have asymmetrical radials. Then radial-gradient(from 25px 25px to cover, blue, transparent) could represent a centered ellipse that covers the box and has a gradient focus at 25px 25px. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 20:03:18 UTC