- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 06:44:57 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Nov 3, 2011, at 11:54 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > The radial-gradient() spec defines 'cover' as an alias for 'farthest-corner' > and 'contain' as an alias for 'closest-side'. > > We generally try to avoid aliases in CSS, why do we have these here and > can we remove one of the pairs? I'm probably damning your idea to an instant rejection from Brian by agreeing with you, but I have stated before that we 'nearest-corner' and 'farthest-side' are not that useful. The only time you can see the difference between them and 'cover/contain' is when the bg-position is off-center, and you see them get clipped in generally un-useful ways. If we had only 'cover' and 'contain', AND changed 'contain' to mean "contain within the sides that you are not moving towards via bg-position", then you would be keeping it both useful and simple, and would continue to let authors get the most popular combinations of side-based and corner-based sizing and clipping.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 16:27:29 UTC