W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

RE: [css3-background] color transition line

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:32:56 +0000
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Řyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9710FCC2E88860489239BE0308AC5D1704430305@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Agree.  Also if you try to make it respond to border-radius, you introduce some cases that don't have any reasonable rendering.

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:25 AM
To: Tab Atkins Jr.
Cc: Řyvind Stenhaug; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css3-background] color transition line

On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>> <https://bug-9197-attachments.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=30423>
> Fantasai, Brad, this seems like *exactly* the sort of useful
> illustration that should be in the spec.  It shows the wrong behavior,
> but if changed to match what we want, it would be *really* useful for
> both authors and implementors.

As an implementor, I don't want the angle of the join to change based on border-radius. Border rendering is already hugely complex; I don't want to add any more complexity, without very good reason.

Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 18:33:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:06 UTC