- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:32:56 +0000
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Agree. Also if you try to make it respond to border-radius, you introduce some cases that don't have any reasonable rendering. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:25 AM To: Tab Atkins Jr. Cc: Øyvind Stenhaug; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-background] color transition line On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> <https://bug-9197-attachments.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=30423> > > Fantasai, Brad, this seems like *exactly* the sort of useful > illustration that should be in the spec. It shows the wrong behavior, > but if changed to match what we want, it would be *really* useful for > both authors and implementors. As an implementor, I don't want the angle of the join to change based on border-radius. Border rendering is already hugely complex; I don't want to add any more complexity, without very good reason. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 18:33:47 UTC