- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:03:13 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/26/2011 02:27 AM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote: >> With regards to replaced elements and their bidi behavior, there are >> two cases to consider: >> - what happens when the image falls back to its alt text >> - what happens if the image is intended to represent a character >> (that is not otherwise encoded or representable) > >> In the first case, the element's effect on its surrounding text >> should be no different whether it is rendered as replaced or as >> text. In this case, we should be treating it as you say -- by >> handling it with the appropriate embedding codes. > > I would argue that in this case, whether rendered or replaced, > the best effect to have on the surrounding is no effect at all, > i.e. the effect of a neutral character (or if you prefer to think > of it that way, unicode-bidi:isolate). We can't do that, because when the alternate contents are rendered, the element is no longer a replaced element, and bidi controls will take effect as for a regular inline element. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 06:13:44 UTC