- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:45:24 +1000
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- CC: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, Chris Jones <cjon@microsoft.com>
On 24/05/2011 1:47 AM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > ± From: Alan Gresley [mailto:alan@css-class.com] ± Sent: Sunday, May > 22, 2011 8:57 PM ± ± Let me rephrase that. Does the spec mention what > side of the viewport ± a scrolling mechanism must appear on when the > overflow is visible ± (clipped out content)? ± > > There is no consensus so far on where scrollbars should appear (and > btw they don't have to appear at all on touch devices). This may > remain undefined for some time. I'm not talking about where a UA places a scrollbar. I talking about the direction of overflow. I will use the example that I used in a thread about canvas origin [1]. The CSS 2.1 spec does not define the direction of visible overflow (obviously there are many years of interoperability when it come to LTR). For LTR we have this. | hidden | hidden-y | -----------X----------------------|------------- | | hidden-x | visible / viewport | overflow-x | | |----------------------|------------- | | | overflow-y | overflow | | For RTL we have this. | hidden-y | hidden | --------------|----------------------X---------- | | overflow-x | visible / viewport | hidden-x | | --------------|----------------------| | | overflow | overflow-y | | | [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0253.html -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 06:45:57 UTC