- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:11:58 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I do believe that the gradient that is seen on this page should never be > allow to work. > > http://css-class.com/test/css/3/gradients/repeating-radial-gradients-danger.htm > > > Even for an author who may have worked with some gradients, the results of > using such small distances between color stops could cause someone with > photosensitive epilepsy [1] to have a seizure without warning. I myself find > it hard to scroll this gradient. > > I do suggest that the CSS WG get feedback from several people who are > qualified in the field of photosensitive epilepsy regarding certain > gradients and animations. > > I myself have always been careful in the use of color with my test and > demos. I do avoid using large segments of red, yellow or fuchsia as > background colors. This is since my wife has a form of photosensitive > epilepsy. I will be changing some of my own animations (increasing > transparency). One has already been changed. Luckily, that's an extremely ugly gradient that should never see the light of day in a real website. More importantly, the fact that the gradient is produced with a CSS function is irrelevant; it could just as easily have been produced as a normal image. While we shouldn't make it *easy* to do bad visual effects if there's no good reason, there's no way to actually prevent bad design here. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 27 May 2011 20:12:45 UTC