- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:16:22 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/24/2011 07:48 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > > On May 24, 2011, at 7:36 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote: > >> We have not implemented the image() function yet, but if we can use >> the image() function to change the resolution of images used in CSS properties, >> the image-resolution property can apply to all (including background) as >> default resolution (authors can change using the image() function). >> So the #2 option seems good for me. > > So it seems there is an advantage to using 'image-resolution': the value > is inherited, so that you could set it once on, say, the body, and you > don't have to set it again unless you want to override it on individual > images (which you can then do via image() if you want). Yes, I was thinking this makes the most sense. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 05:16:53 UTC