- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:52:26 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: >> As such, I propose that we go ahead and disallow this kind of thing. >> I'll define a <base-image> type that is produced by functions like url(), >> image(), and linear-gradient(). Pipeline functions like >> cross-fade() or filter() will be defined to only take <base-image>s as input, >> and will produce <composed-image>s as output, so by definition you won't >> be able to nest them. > > With and without your proposal, what's the expected behavior for transitions of background-image when the to and from both contain cross-fade? Sigh, I had something like this tickling my brain, but I ignored it. Yeah, transitioning a cross-fade() image produces a nested cross-fade(), so there's no way to disallow it. Never mind, then! ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 21:53:13 UTC