- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:07:14 +0200
- To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Just a question: are you assuming that only one animation can apply to an object at the same time ? If no, how do you deal with the cases when two animations applying on the same object don't have the same timing (with a pseudo-attribute) ? Or are you restricting the use of the pseudo-attribute withing an @animation block ? If so, what's the point of having a pseudo attribute at all, since the only element which is impacted by an animation is the element that host the animation (or isn't it?). (Sorry if I didn't correctly understood your proposal, it seems very unclear to me what's your intent here which is why I'm asking this.) -----Message d'origine----- From: Daniel Glazman Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:29 PM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css-animations] new property suggestion: animation-iteration-delay Le 23/05/11 06:43, Estelle Weyl a écrit : > @animation 'showbriefly' { > 0%, 20%, 100% {opacity: 0;} > 1%, 19% {opacity: 1;} > } Hmmmm. Nice. Loving it. And I wonder if we should not have some new construct called a pseudo-attribute to make sure the contents of the outer block are style rules, in other terms selectors followed by a block of declarations... We could then turn the above 10% (for instance) into that pseudo-attribute and done. Something like [:frame="10%"] {opacity: 0;} (don't focus on the syntax, focus on the concept please) </Daniel> -- W3C CSS WG, Co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 20:07:25 UTC