Re: proposed new module: css3 floats and positioning

Hi Alex, CSS Group,

So we should talk about how to merge your proposal and the CSS Exclusions
draft into a new draft. It would be great to co-edit this document if you
would like to.

Also, I think we should have a discussion about how we want to name this
module. I added this to the agenda scratchpad:
http://wiki.csswg.org/planning/agenda#topics-proposed-for-next-call.

Vincent

On 5/18/11 5:50 PM, "Alex Mogilevsky" <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:

>± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
>± Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:50 PM
>± 
>± http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b48H0
>± 
>
>Ah, I remember that one. I suppose if you plan to develop it more it
>should be in CSS3 positioning too.
>
>± > To me it seems reasonable to have separate specs, especially if css3-
>± position will include all of CSS2.1 positioning, with writing modes,
>± precise definition of the hypothetical static box etc.
>± >
>± > If we plan on that we can keep a concise positioning section in css3-
>± floats until it is moved to your spec.
>± 
>± Sounds good.
>
>It looks like the way to go for now... CSS3 Floats should be just floats,
>it will have a temporary positioning section and we will discuss the
>future of positioning spec separately.

Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 22:28:55 UTC