- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:44:54 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
v.1.9.3 removes the syntaxes that show the equivalent negative angled values from Examples IX and XI. While you could argue that the (now) -180deg case for Example IX is uninteresting, I think it's worth keeping the negative-angled equivalent in Example XI. Tab, can you add back the appropriate negative angle syntax to Example XI? - Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr. > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:06 AM > To: www-style list; Robert O'Callahan; Simon Fraser > Subject: Re: [css3-images] Changing the angles in gradients > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: > > So, we have three choices: > > > > A) Keep the angles as they are, with 0deg=East and 90deg=North > > B) Switch to screen-coord polar, with 0deg=East and 90deg=South > > C) Switch to bearing angles, with 0deg=North and 90deg=East > > Based on the frankly overwhelming preference for C expressed in the > various feedback channels, particularly the css3.info poll, I'll change the spec > to use bearing angles. > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 21:45:23 UTC