- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:43:02 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@gmail.com>
On May 17, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > So, we have three choices: > > A) Keep the angles as they are, with 0deg=East and 90deg=North > B) Switch to screen-coord polar, with 0deg=East and 90deg=South > C) Switch to bearing angles, with 0deg=North and 90deg=East > > Except for 'azimuth', current properties are consistent with either B > or C, as they just use the angles for rotation, not direction. I > slightly lean towards B now, but I'd be okay with C too. > > Implementors, what do you think? Are you okay with changing the angle > definition? If so, do you prefer B or C? As an implementor I'm happy to change WebKit to follow vox populi. I think that the new prefixed gradient syntax is used little enough so far that I'd probably just change the -webkit behavior. Had I to vote, I would go for B or C. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 23:43:36 UTC