- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:28:50 +0000
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> And of course, there is considerably less need for 'repeating-radial-gradient', > other than for symmetry and consistency of properties if you do have a > repeating-linear-gradient property. Disagree. IMO, there's *more* need for repeating-radial-gradient than there is for repeating-linear-gradient. Some, arguably most, of what you can do with repeating-radial-gradient you can't do in any other way without using child elements to provide a larger surface to measure and draw against. - Brian
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 23:29:18 UTC