- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:02:18 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/11/2011 10:57 AM, Daniel Weck wrote: > >> I'm not convinced of this use case. Do we really have users who would >> rather silence a cue than remove it? > > Well, SSML eloquently states: > > --- > "silent", the contained text is read silently; > --- > > When this "silencing" logic is applied to spoken text via the main > 'voice-volume' control, it affects the volume level in the > aural box model as a whole. As a result, prerecorded audio cues > "automatically" get silenced, as their volume is expressed > relatively. That makes sense. We can do that already, though. > Arguably, this isn't motivated by any tangible use-case, If we don't have a tangible use-case (or even a good theoretical one!), let's not complicate the the cue syntax by adding this. If it turns out it's needed, then people can post to www-style and we can add it later. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:02:46 UTC