Re: [css3-speech] Editorial Comments Part II

Fixed in the latest editors' draft, thanks!

http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech

On 2 May 2011, at 19:05, fantasai wrote:

> A couple quick, but significant comments:
>
> 1. For manageability (especially when testing), spec should be  
> broken down into
>   more subsections than it is currently. Except where pairs of  
> properties are
>   defined together (e.g. 'cue-before' + 'cue-after' share a  
> definition), each
>   property should get its own subsection.
>
> 2. It would be good for each feature that corresponds to an SSML  
> feature to
>   link to the appropriate section of the SSML spec, perhaps in a  
> note, so that
>   it's well understood how CSS3 Speech and SSML correspond. This  
> should also
>   help reviewers catch any mismatches. :)
>
> ~fantasai
>

Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:27:08 UTC