- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:12:47 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 3/22/11 7:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 3/22/11 7:57 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>> >>> Uh... last I checked, every single UA does this. If I take a 100px by >>> 100px image and I style it with "width: 200px" then it'll get rendered >>> at 200px by 200px. >> >> Oh, I see. We're talking about the case of no intrinsic height but an >> intrinsic ratio. I thought Firefox 4 used the intrinsic ratio in this >> situation... > > Er, and the intrinsic ratio case _is_ the case that covers non-auto width > and existing intrinsic width/height. So I stand by my original mail! Well, no, we're explicitly talking about when it doesn't have intrinsic width or height, like an SVG with only a viewBox. That said, I was wrong and I don't know how I was thinking what I thought. Yes, Opera and Firefox compute the auto dimensions of the element from the ratio of its contents in this case. Chrome and IE do not. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 00:13:40 UTC