- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:17:25 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I've run out of time to go into any detail right now, but I wanted to express that I'm unhappy with the resolution to Issue 229 (effect of a later float on previous line boxes) because it doesn't address my original issue, it makes too many easy-to-handle cases undefined for the different issue that it does handle, and it's also editorially flawed: "if a float's position is foo then its position is undefined" is self-contradictory; it can't be undefined if it's possible to determine that it's foo! Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 02:17:54 UTC