- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:51:36 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2011, at 1:56 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/3/16 Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>: >> How about something that said not to take the glyph size and font leading >> into account at all for line box height calculation, unless it us the only >> thing on the line and needs to be an input into line-height (for em line >> height, for example). Then it could also maybe solve the problem of >> vertical-align:sup creating a big gap between two lines. > > Nah, you want it to take the height of the large letter into account, > just not the nonexistent descender. You presume to know what I want? First lines are not the only lines to get messed up in spite of consistent line-heights on the whole block. > > Something to keep in mind is that you do *not* want an entire line of > text to shrink just because you happened to not use any letters with > descenders on that line. Hyatt's first suggestion is good in this > respect, because it uses the line-height of the root inline box as a > base and then just limits how much it can grow. > > ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 23:52:48 UTC