- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:55:11 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Heads-up: I received no objection against the proposal quoted below, and no feedback regarding the issue either [1]. I will update the editor's draft of CSS3-Speech soon, based on what I think is the best direction. Obviously, reviews / comments are still very much welcome. Regards, Daniel [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/Overview.html#issue-voice-cues-volume On 5 Feb 2011, at 12:37, Daniel Weck wrote: > Dear all, > I don't understand the rationale for this particular statement, in > [1]: > > " > Note that ‘voice-volume’ does not apply to audio cues for which > there is a separate means to set loudness (absolute, or relative to > ‘voice-volume’). > " > > I totally agree with audio cues [2] adjusting their output levels > relatively to the 'voice-volume', but why should they be able to set > absolute volume values ? > > For example, a text with "voice-volume:silent" should have its cues > muted as well, yet audio cues can override this. By analogy to the > visual 'visibility' property (and by virtue of the "aural box > model" [3]), the borders of an invisible element are now shown: the > entire element (content, padding, border and margin) remains > involved in the layout, but is "transparent" (which is equivalent to > "silent" in the aural dimension). > > If nobody objects, I would like to restrict volume control for audio > cues in relative terms only (percentage applicable to the voice- > volume value). > > Sorry if I am missing a point here. > Many thanks, Daniel > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-volume > > [2] > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#cue-props > > [3] > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#aural-model Daniel Weck daniel.weck@gmail.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 22:55:47 UTC