- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:08:11 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
line-box-contain is basically perfect, so I'll just go with that for now. dave On Mar 16, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > 2011/3/16 Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>: >> How about something that said not to take the glyph size and font leading >> into account at all for line box height calculation, unless it us the only >> thing on the line and needs to be an input into line-height (for em line >> height, for example). Then it could also maybe solve the problem of >> vertical-align:sup creating a big gap between two lines. > > Nah, you want it to take the height of the large letter into account, > just not the nonexistent descender. > > Something to keep in mind is that you do *not* want an entire line of > text to shrink just because you happened to not use any letters with > descenders on that line. Hyatt's first suggestion is good in this > respect, because it uses the line-height of the root inline box as a > base and then just limits how much it can grow. > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 21:08:45 UTC