- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:16:08 -0500
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
I think "glyphs" would be a better term than "text", and hopefully the examples I showed illustrate the need for such a value. dave (hyatt@apple.com) On Mar 16, 2011, at 2:12 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2011-03-16 14:07 -0500, David Hyatt wrote: >> Rule 5 talks about a "text" value, but it's not included in the defined set. >> >> "For each box that has ‘text’ in ‘line-box-contain’, the top of >> the line box must be at least as high as the top of each glyph in >> the box (excluding those in child elements). The bottom of the >> line box must be at least as low as the bottom of each glyph in >> the box (excluding child elements)." >> >> That sounds like your "glyphs" suggestion, no? > > Er, I have a vague memory that it was in my original proposal for > line-box-contain, but removed because others in the WG didn't want > that value, but then I missed a bit of the removing when I edited it > into the draft. But I'm not sure of that... and searching the > member-confidential archives is a pain. > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 19:16:42 UTC