- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:22:02 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Monday, March 14, 2011 5:14 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Arron Eicholz > <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote: > > On Monday, March 14, 2011 5:01 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> We did *not* resolve to update the specification in that manner; > >> that's just fantasai's most recent proposal, which we determined > >> during the ftf was insufficient. According to > >> <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-224>, we accepted my > proposal. > >> > > > > I knew in responding to so many of these I was going to get one or two of > the incorrect. > > > > Thanks for catching my mistake. You are correct it does say accept your > proposal. > > No problem; I just wanted to ensure the record was correct, so Bert didn't > end up accidentally referring to this email and editting the spec wrong. ^_^ > Below is the correct change that will be made to the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. Sorry for the confusion and I hope the resolves your issue. | 1. If the image has an intrinsic width and height, the used width and | height are the same. | | 2. Otherwise, if the image has an intrinsic ratio and either an | intrinsic width or an intrinsic height, the used width/height is the | same as the provided intrinsic width/height, and the used value of the | missing dimension is calculated from the provided dimension and the | ratio. | | 3. Otherwise, if the image has an intrinsic ratio, the used width is | 1em and the used height is calculated from this width and the | intrinsic ratio. If this would produce a height larger than 1em, then | the used height is instead set to 1em and the used width is calculated | from this height and the intrinsic ratio. | | 4. Otherwise, the image's used width is its intrinsic width if it has | one, or else 1em. The image's used height is its intrinsic height if | it has one, or else 1em. Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 16:22:41 UTC