- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:01:20 -0700
- To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote: > Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. > > The CSSWG resolved to update the specification: > > # 1. If the image has an intrinsic width or height, then that intrinsic > # width/height becomes the image's used width/height. > # 2. If the image's intrinsic width or height is given as a percentage, > # then that percentage is resolved against 1em. > # 3. If the image has a width but no height or vice versa, the missing > # dimension is calculated from the intrinsic ratio (if any). > # 4. If the image's width or height cannot be resolved from the rules above, > # then that dimension is assumed to be 1em. > > We hope this closes your issue. > > Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. We did *not* resolve to update the specification in that manner; that's just fantasai's most recent proposal, which we determined during the ftf was insufficient. According to <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-224>, we accepted my proposal. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 00:02:11 UTC