- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:26:30 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thursday, November 04, 2010 8:44 AM L. David Baron wrote: > In sections 10.3.2 and 10.6.2 CSS 2.1 has references to percentage intrinsic > widths/heights. > > In discussions with the SVG working group just now, the SVG working group > believes that width/height on the root SVG element never actually lead to a > percentage intrinsic dimension. > > Since these cases of percentage intrinsic dimensions actually all lead to > horrible results, we should probably remove mention of percentage intrinsic > dimensions from the specification, since we don't actually have any use cases > for them (and fix the relevant tests in the test suite). > Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. The CSSWG resolved to remove the mention of percentage intrinsic width/height from the CSS 2.1 spec. We hope this closes your issue. Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 23:27:05 UTC