- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:29:38 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:00:14 +0100, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 15:30, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> > wrote: >> On 03/01/2011 03:15 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: >>> >>> There is very little "official" guidance on vendor prefixes - you're >>> not >>> alone. >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-2010/#experimental > > Thanks for that - good to have a reference for "experimental > implementations" in addition to "vendor specific extensions". > > Updated/expanded: > > http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes Thanks Tantek, After reading through <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes#cursor-zoom-in-zoom-out> and discussing this internally I've gone ahead and removed the -o- prefix from the zoom-in and zoom-out values. I'm not sure yet when this will be released in the wild, but it's safe to say that the prefixed versions will be short-lived enough to not matter. It's my strictly personal opinion that it would be good to consider prefixing more on a case-by-case basis. There must be many more features which are in practice stable but are still prefixed just because of the uncertainty around the situation. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 12 March 2011 11:30:14 UTC