- From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:52 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of fantasai > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:03 PM > To: Peter Moulder; www-style list > Subject: Re: [CSS21] Re: Clarification needed for inline boxes containing block > boxes > > On 03/07/2011 11:09 AM, fantasai wrote: > > > > Filed as CSS2.1 Issue 242: > > http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-242 > > Updated proposal -- > > Replace > # are broken around the block-level box, dividing the inline box > # into two pieces (even if either side is empty) with > # are broken around the block-level box (and any consecutive > # block-level siblings, ignoring any collapsible white space > # or out-of-flow elements in between them), splitting the inline > # box into two boxes, one each side of the block-level box. > > It's a bit awkward, but I think that should work. Thoughts? > > > Also need a proposal to address z-index issues... > > (This has been deferred to another issue.) > > ~fantasai > The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. The CSSWG resolved: "are broken around the block-level box (and any block-level siblings that are consecutive or separated only by collapsible whitespace and/or out-of-flow elements), splitting the inline box into two boxes (even if either side is empty), one on each side of the block-level box." We hope this closes your issue. Please respond before 14 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS
Received on Friday, 11 March 2011 16:40:06 UTC