- From: Xaxio Brandish <xaxiobrandish@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:13:26 -0800
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTik6ndpj7yQwjGAqXkqukpxmJ9R1qun6OZ_ASKXH@mail.gmail.com>
Good afternoon, As long as we're talking about text-shadow enhancements... In CSS 2, text-shadow is present as part of the recommendation, and supports the value 'inherit', but it was not inherited by default. [1] CSS 2.1 doesn't mention text-shadow at all (it was removed to be put in CSS 3?) [2] In CSS 3, 'inherit' is not present as a value, but it is inherited by default. [3] My question is, should the 'inherit' value be present? I think it could be useful for forced-perspective styles that change based on interaction or for effect. Also, it seems that Opera, Firefox, and Chrome treat it as if it's a valid value? [4] --Xaxio [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/text.html#text-shadow-props [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/text.html [3] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-shadow [4] http://xaxio.com/style/text-shadow-inherit-001.xht On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jordan OSETE <jordan.osete@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Also, I ran into a little spec-related issue: as text-shadow allows > > multiple shadows (unlike box shadow), should we allow a different > > inset status for each shadow ? And if we do, how do we handle cases > > where inset and normal shadows are stacked one above another ? Should > > we "force" all inset shadows to be defined before normal ones, and > > throw a syntax error else ? > > Box-shadow also allows multiple shadows. Insets are all above the > background and others are all below the background, even if they are > interleaved in the value list. >
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 02:35:29 UTC