- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:11:54 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Estelle Weyl <estelle@weyl.org>
- CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org CSS" <www-style@w3.org>
But people are suggesting that it be required rather than optional. Which gets to the root of it... If the currently somewhat-interoperable implementation is "bad", then we should considering just making it a required parameter if we're too soft-willed to define it. Leaving this UA-defined is bad for the web 2 years from now, IMO. - Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of fantasai > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 2:10 PM > To: Estelle Weyl > Cc: Brad Kemper; Sylvain Galineau; www-style@w3.org CSS > Subject: Re: [css3-background] Default shadow color > > On 03/03/2011 07:52 PM, Estelle Weyl wrote: > > Yes, it is a hack, > > but the point i am trying to make is that it is easier to declare a > > drop shadow of grey for all your text than to determine what color the > > text is if you do want to use a drop shadow that is equivalent to > > currentColor.. > > Um, you just specify currentColor? > > text-shadow: 0 0 1px currentColor; > > Nobody's saying this should be disallowed. > > ~fantasai >
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 23:12:30 UTC