- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, Vladimir Levantovsky <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>, liam@w3.org, StyleBeyondthePunchedCard <www-style@w3.org>, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font@w3.org, "Martin J." <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Glenn Adams wrote: > > As background, I think it would be useful to read through a > > description of a recent WebGL security issue below. The context is > > slightly different but the issue is the same, especially what is > > described in the section "Cross-Domain Image Theft": > > > > http://www.contextis.com/resources/blog/webgl/ > > i will take a look at this, but it sounds like "content protection" > and DRM scope to me just from the phrase "image theft" You should look at this more carefully, it relates more to the security of *users* than to the security of the underlying content. It's worth a close study, it highlights a class of security issue that user agents must deal with these days. Including user agents on set-top boxes that want to support recent W3C specifications. John Daggett
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 13:08:48 UTC