- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:13:09 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-pitch # voice-pitch: <frequency> | <percentage> | <relative-value> && relative ... # <frequency> # Specifies the average pitch of the speaking voice using an # absolute value in frequency units (Hertz and kiloHertz, e.g. # "100Hz", "+2kHz") as per the syntax of frequency values # defined in [CSS3VAL]. Only positive values are allowed. ... # <relative-value> # Specifies a relative change (decrement or increment) to the # inherited value. The syntax of allowed values is a <number>, # followed immediately by either of "Hz" (for Hertz) or "kHz" # (for kiloHertz) or "st" (for semitones). # relative # This keyword specifies that the provided value is expressed # relatively to another base value. This is in order to # disambiguate from absolute <frequency> values. I think, given that semitones can only be relative, that it would make more sense to define this as either | voice-pitch: <frequency> && relative? | <percentage> | <semitone> or | voice-pitch: <frequency> && absolute? | <percentage> | <semitone> depending on whether voice-family: 120Hz; voice-family: 5Hz relative; or voice-family: 120Hz absolute; voice-family: 5Hz; seems the more reasonable pair. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 02:13:34 UTC