One could also argue that taking 10 years to move this spec to REC forced the hand of this particular industry. So it cuts both ways. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>wrote: > “How is this done? By considering any form of published W3C document as a > PAS "publicly available specification" [1] with a persistent URL. This is > done regardless of the warnings in the status section.”**** > > ** ** > > So because other organizations have deliberately chosen to ignore explicit > w3c disclaimers, w3c WGs are expected to deal with the consequences of those > decisions after the fact ? Is it any surprise that engaging in a dialogue on > such a basis ought to be somewhat difficult? **** >
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 05:44:07 UTC