- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:06:09 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, www-font@w3.org
Glenn wrote: > I believe we could agree to the first, but not to the second. In fact, > we want to make the second to read as: > UAs MUST NOT, by default, treat webfont resources as > same origin restricted. > In the absence of an author declaring either a restriction or a > relaxation, we believe the default should be NO restriction. For all resources, or for webfonts in particular? May I echo Tab's question, and ask why? I'd like to get a clearer idea of whether Samsung's position is essentially a matter of principle or has some particular practical import for UAs. JH
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 19:06:41 UTC