- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:24:23 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, www-font@w3.org
Glenn wrote: > I believe Samsung could agree to making an authorial opt-in mechanism a > mandatory feature on UAs that access WOFF; however, I believe we will > not be able to agree with a policy that requires use of a restrictive > opt-out mechanism which by default would prevent access. Would this be satisfactory, in terms of a Webfonts Conformance Specification (exact wording to be drafted, this is just to capture the intent)? UAs MUST respect author header settings restricting or relaxing same origin. UAs SHOULD, by default, treat webfont resources as same origin restricted. I think many of us would want to make that second statement a SHOULD rather than a MAY, simply to encourage UA makers to give serious thought as to whether they have a good reason not to treat webfont resources in this way. JH
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 18:25:14 UTC