- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:27:03 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 06/19/2011 06:07 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > $ seems much less confusing to me personally, but I think almost anything would be. I wasn't even bothered by Ian's original > # proposal. OK. > just out of curiosity, what would something like this mean (a value to the left of the subject) ...would it be valid? > > div:matches(.foo $ > .bar) That means a div that has a .foo ancestor and a .bar child. It's the same as writing .foo $div > .bar :matches() just means an element represented by the selector in its argument. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 17:27:40 UTC