- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:01:08 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 6/17/11 10:19 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > In reading verbiage of the draft and the comments - is that to say that > would be valid or invalid? > > div:matches(p) That's no different from div:not(div). It's a valid selector that matches no elements. > It seems to be that it would it be effectively the same as: > > !div p It wouldn't be, actually. -Boris
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 17:01:45 UTC