- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:34:24 +1000
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 15/06/2011 3:18 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: > From: Alan Gresley [mailto:alan@css-class.com] On 15/06/2011 11:34 >> AM, Brian Manthos wrote: >>> Or perhaps... >>> >>> "Why do these render the same? (a) linear-gradient(bottom, red, >>> blue); (b) linear-gradient(0deg, red, blue); " >> >> >> The shouldn't render the same. > > > With the (1.107) version of the editor's draft (with the angle > coordinate system change but without the keyword change), yes they > do. That's the one I referring to. > Which is part of the reason I raised the issue in the first place. > > <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html?rev=1.107;content-type=text%2Fhtml> > > section 5.1.1 > > # If a ‘top’, ‘right’, ‘bottom’, or ‘left’ is given, # the used value > of the gradient is 180deg, 270deg, 0deg, # or 90deg, respectively. > > > I don't know how to express it more clearly than direct normative > text from the spec. You don't have to. I glad you found it. -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 05:35:02 UTC