- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:25:33 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "w3c-css-wg (w3c-css-wg@w3.org)" <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS1/ has this paragraph at the top: > > ----- > > Note: This paragraph is informative. This document is currently not > maintained. The CSS Working Group is developing CSS Level 2 Revision 1, > which has much more precise and Web-compatible definitions of the features > described here. The CSS Working Group encourages authors and implementors to > reference CSS 2.1 (or its successor) instead of this document and when > features common to CSS1 and CSS 2.1 are defined differently to follow the > definitions in CSS 2.1. > > ----- > > In that paragraph, “is developing” is no longer true, it needs to be > replaced with “HAS DEVELOPED”. Dude, why are you reading or caring about the CSS1 spec? That became obsolete while I was in middle school. ^_^ In any case, we're going to be working on 2.1 errata for the foreseeable future, so we're in the "is developing" phase. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 22:26:35 UTC