- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:58:22 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:39 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 2011-06-14 13:27 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> * changed the way I address the marker-in-content use-case, from >> "display:marker" to "position:marker". The latter is a new >> positioning scheme that emulates 'outside' list marker positioning. > > Why? It seems to be a much cleaner solution. The distinguishing aspect of an outside marker is that it's positioned specially. Capturing that specifically via positioning seems to be the right thing to do. Using "display" required introducing the notion of "candidates", and was more confusing with how it interacted with ::marker. (Not all of that is strictly necessary, but I felt it was the best way to do it at the time, and it's just not very good in general.) > I much prefer 'display' rather than 'position' (though we > really never should have had 'position' in the first place). I boggled when I heard this at the FtF. ^_^ position:absolute is too weak in CSS2.1, and thus of limited utility, but positioning in general is a good thing that is useful. It's just an alternate layout model that can operate simultaneously with other layout models. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 20:59:10 UTC