Re: [CSS4 Selectors] :has() (was Re: [CSSWG] ... F2F Kyoto]

On Jun 11, 2011, at 6:47 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, all of those examples seem intuitive.  Specifying the subject of the selector is something CSS has never done before, but that is what is in CSS SELECTORS LEVEL 4 that originated this.  In there though, your example:
> 
> ul:has(a)
> 
> Would be written, if I understand correctly:
> 
> !ul a
> 
That exclamation point makes me think of "not" also.