I have read through the wiki and the discussions surrounding subject/matches/has and I can't seem to find where ! is introduced. In any case, I ran this privately past 5 designers and 2 programmers who are very good with CSS and without fail all eight of us had the same reaction as Opera voiced "that means not". There was also unanimous agreement that has() as presented by Ian and implemented in jQuery for some time (with the addition of supporting rhs combinator), despite a smattering of limitations is both infinitely more intuitive/readable and fulfills the vast majority of their real world needs. It is also easy to implement and has the advantage that it already has shown its practical worth and is used by a large community. As I said, I read fantasai's comments on this, and I understand the objections on a larger "matches", but :has() seems like low hanging fruit that accomplishes a lot even if it could also be written with a matches() or some symbol notation. Even if the later has much expressive power, I would personally willingly trade a certain amount of whatever that is for simple intuitiveness and readability. Just feedback from a few users. On Jun 10, 2011 11:24 PM, "John Jansen" <John.Jansen@microsoft.com> wrote:
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2011 12:38:56 UTC