- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:35:16 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:27:06 +0900, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > As long as we kept it to corners and sides, and not two sets of two > lengths? My only problem with it then is how long it is. "bottom left to > top right" is pretty wordy for something that can already include a LOT > of text (if there are a lot of color stops with positions, for instance, > inside a property like 'background' that can have multiple layers. For diagonals, I was thinking "bottom to right" might cut it. > That is the most positive review of the idea I have heard yet! :) > > Other pluses: It also reduces the number of keywords needed to just one, > allows you to create some gradients that you wouldn't otherwise be able > to (but with hardly any added complexity), and makes every author word > their linear gradients in a more similar fashion (which makes learning > the syntax by looking at examples easier). Sorry, I am new here. Has this been discussed before? What were the objections? - Florian
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 09:35:50 UTC