- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 05:52:24 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Sorry, not sure I follow. Can you elaborate ? Actual use-cases backing up the model is what we are definitely after since that is the only way to demonstrate it to be better than alternatives. Thanks! ________________________________________ From: www-style-request@w3.org [www-style-request@w3.org] on behalf of fantasai [fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:40 PM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-images] linear-gradient keywords and angles are opposite On 06/09/2011 09:25 AM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > Why shouldn't top mean 'towards the top' and right 'towards the right' so > that transitioning from top to right is equivalent to going from 0deg to 90deg > on a bearing compass ? That seems perfectly coherent to me. Because if my gradient has a fixed length (which is reasonably common for creating edge effects via background-image), the "towards the top" interpretation would place it at the bottom of the box. I think *that* is counter-intuitive. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 05:53:04 UTC