- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:18:16 +0900
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brian Blakely <anewpage.media@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thursday 2011-06-02 17:07 -0700, Brad Kemper wrote: > On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:35 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would expect the two lines to rotate as though the transform was applied to their bounding box, all without disturbing any of the content outside the span. > > > > Even if the inlines are in different CSS columns? > > Yes. > > > Or if the inlines are in completely unrelated positions on the page due to CSS regions? > > Yes. > > > How about different printed pages? > > It might be a little odd, but yes, if the author did something that silly, he should get consistent results. I think that is most intuitive, explainable, and expected. For the different pages case, I don't think it's even defined. CSS doesn't, as far as I know, define how positions on different pages relate to each other, and I tend to think that's probably a good thing and it shouldn't define such a relationship. Otherwise I think it's probably reasonable, though it's a pain to implement. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 01:18:46 UTC