- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:49:14 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 27, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > I meant an example usage, but that's good enough for now. > > I'd rather see the interpolation specified in the gradient specification itself. > > Doing it as part of the gradient itself would allow for varying the interpolation mode across layers of a background-image specification, whereas doing it as a separate property wouldn't allow that. Unless of course you want to make color-interpolation a layered property as well... That strikes me as a very good point. An author who who wants this level of control over whether or not to premultiply might also want to control it on a background layer by background layer basis.
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 23:49:53 UTC