- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:16:48 -0700
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org, public-media-fragment@w3.org
On 07/27/2011 12:19 AM, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear Tab, > >> I agree that it's difficult to find a good answer. If we think the >> problem is essentially impossible, then we should just make it >> explicitly unsupported, not undefined. > > Follow-up of this thread, the Editor Draft now states (section 4.2.2), > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-space: > > "Note that in the case of pixel-based clipping areas, application of those > areas to multi-resolutions visual media is unsupported. More generally, > pixel-clip an image that does not have a single well defined pixel resolution > (width and height) is not recommended." > > Do you agree with this reformulation? Define "unsupported". What does the UA do when presented with such a situation? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 21:17:24 UTC