- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:16:45 -0400
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 18:17:20 UTC
I did not suggest that it be unparsed, in fact, that is the antithesis of what I have suggested... I've re-read my posts a few times now and I see several times where I am mentioning a subset parse of module, property, value parse on demand of things the browser does not understand. I said earlier that Anne's parser objection is the best though overcomeable. Basically, like DOM, CSSOM could have a concept of "well formed" rules being able to be exposed in a simple meta format. On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Daniel Glazman < daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > Le 26/07/11 10:20, Brian Kardell a écrit : > >> I think this basically gets into what such a proposal would have to >> say... We can work that out. I'm merely looking for a really basic >> subset parse that gives us something more akin to a syntax tree or some >> nice intermediate meta structure based on "well formed" data. > > Oh, that's interesting ! So you say an UnknownRule could contain a list > of syntax tokens? Hmmmm, really interesting I must say ! > Cannot be a syntax "tree" since it's unparsed. > > </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 18:17:20 UTC