W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2011

[cssom-view] Unrecognized - request for more information

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:16:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CADC=+jcVqAhjeto+6VV3o8+cUFj31Fs8ujko6P5pMTZ1Rsk25w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I did not suggest that it be unparsed, in fact, that is the antithesis of
what I have suggested... I've re-read my posts a few times now and I see
several times  where I am mentioning a subset parse of module, property,
value parse on demand of things the browser does not understand.

I said earlier that Anne's parser objection is the best though overcomeable.
 Basically, like DOM, CSSOM could have a concept of "well formed" rules
being able to be exposed in a simple meta format.

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Daniel Glazman <
daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> Le 26/07/11 10:20, Brian Kardell a crit :
>> I think this basically gets into what such a proposal would have to
>> say... We can work that out.   I'm merely looking for a really basic
>> subset parse that gives us something more akin to a syntax tree or some
>> nice intermediate meta structure based on "well formed" data.
> Oh, that's interesting ! So you say an UnknownRule could contain a list
> of syntax tokens? Hmmmm, really interesting I must say !
> Cannot be a syntax "tree" since it's unparsed.
> </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 18:17:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:02 UTC