- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:08:27 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org>, WWW-Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, the way I thought of it was to stretch a square to determine the > length, angle, and placement of the gradient path. But still place the color > stops along the final path within the final rectangle. What Behnam made me > think though is that the final angle shouldn't be based on the path of the > two gradient endpoints (45deg to connect two corners), but rather on a path > perpendicular to the OTHER two endpoints. Once you resolve what the final > used angle should be in degrees, you just treat it like those degrees were > specified by the author. I think that's very difficult to visualize or think about, and it would be unimaginably simpler to just draw the gradient into a square and then stretch it, exactly as if you were using objectBoundingBox units. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 22:09:14 UTC