- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:26:58 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > Actually there is a problem, which is that external resource document loads > and image loads are different beasts right now and are implemented somewhat > differently in Gecko, and it would be a lot of work to determine if they can > be made perfectly consistent. One issue is that we impose a same-origin > restriction on SVG external resource loads, but not CSS image loads > obviously. They're different in WebKit, too, I believe. > Maybe we can get away with saying that url() with a fragment reference is an > external resource document load, and url() without a fragment reference is > an image load. That would break existing intended uses of svg-with-frag in url(), such as referring to a <view> element to display a subset of a larger image, or using Media Fragments syntax. Hm. There should be some simple distinction to make in here. >_< ~TJ
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 03:27:45 UTC