On 07/13/2011 12:08 PM, Daniel Weck wrote: > > On 13 Jul 2011, at 19:59, fantasai wrote: >> Ah, that's a problem. You can't ignore a property because it's computed >> value is negative. You can only ignore invalid things at parse time. > > Oh, let's clamp to the minimum numerical boundary then (this would be > consistent with other cases in the spec). Makes sense. > I would expect a speech engine to support a specific range of admissible > frequencies, and to gracefully handle "awkward" values such as 0Hz. You should specify this explicitly -- that there may be UA-specific limits on the frequency and that UAs must clamp out-of-range actual (as opposed to used or computed) values to this range. ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 19:29:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:02 UTC