- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:52:49 +0100
- To: www style <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On 13 Jul 2011, at 19:41, fantasai wrote: > The pair of 'voice-pitch-range' and 'voice-pitch' are a little strange. > Usually if we have a property whose name is a subset of the other, it's > a shorthand that sets, among other things, that longhand. An example > would be 'font-variant' and 'font-variant-caps'. I see. > But 'voice-pitch' and > 'voice-pitch-range' do not have such a relationship; they're independent > properties. > > So I'm wondering if 'voice-pitch-range' should have a different name, > maybe shorten to 'voice-range' or 'voice-variance' or somesuch? The SSML term is "range", so "voice-range" would seem satisfactory. I have no objection to renaming the property (I am not aware of any implementation of it). http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis11/#edef_prosody
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 18:53:20 UTC